CORE TEXT
Stengers, Isabelle. In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism. Translated by Andrew Goffey, Open Humanities Press, 2015.
SUMMARY
In this book, Isabelle Stengers reminds us that we’re at the juncture of two histories: one that is familiar to us and one that is to come. The familiar history is dominated by capitalism. It is a history in which we deify the market. Progress is defined as economic growth and scientific and technological innovation. We must strive for progress at all cost in this history, even if that progress will cause widespread environmental damage and profound suffering of humankind. Stengers encourages us to question who benefits from the systems and narratives we take for granted. She gives us the theoretical tools and language to question the status quo. It is the only way we can top being complacent and prepare for the coming history. The history to come will be dominated by the intrusion of Gaia, who will be just as indifferent to our reasoning as capitalism is. The intrusion of Gaia is climate change personified. Stengers suggests that we provoked Gaia to intrude because of the destructive way in which we treated the planet. Rather than struggling against Gaia, we should be struggling against the systems that provoked Gaia. If we fail to do so, Stengers warns, we will be complacent in creating a barbaric future in which we will be condemning millions of lives to the hazards of climate change. We have been taught to believe that our existing way of living, no matter how destructive it is for the planet, is the only way to be. To question this narrative and to think and imagine a different kind of future are political acts, according to Stengers.
TEACHING RESOURCES
Arendt, Hannah. “The Decline of the Nation-State and the End of The Rights of Man.” The Origins of Totalitarianism. Ohio: The World Publishing Company, 1958, pg. 267-302. In her seminal essay, Hannah Arendt describes the way inmates of concentration camps were treated and suggests that what is barbaric are the concentration camps designed by civilized society. She states. “Deadly danger to any civilization is no longer to come from without. Nature has been mastered and no barbarians threaten to destroy what they cannot understand. . . The danger is that a global, universally interrelated civilization may produce barbarians from its own midst” (Arendt, 302). Without the complicity and indifference of civilians, it wouldn’t be possible to maintain systems that are designed to inflict structural violence. That’s why it’s necessary for civilians to participate in structural violence and crimes committed by political leaders. Indifference is a passive form of participation. Arendt claims that the inmates of camps were the model citizens of a totalitarian state because they will behave as they’re trained and won’t question authority even when they’re led to their death. This depicts what is at stake if we don’t question structural injustices and don’t fight against them.
Coetzee, J.M.. Waiting for the Barbarians. Penguin Books, 1999. Throughout J.M. Coetzee’s novel there is a constant sense of anxiety about the barbarians who are considered enemies of the Empire. The Empire symbolizes civilized society which lives according to law and order and the barbarians represent those who exist outside of civilized society. Therefore, it’s presumed that they don’t have any order or law that prevents them from being violent. They’re portrayed as rapists, looters, and ultimately a threat to the sense of order created by the Empire. However, the paranoia about the barbarians draws the reader’s attention to the internal world of the Empire itself rather than the barbarians. Coetzee shows us that under the control of a regime like the Empire, no one can claim innocence. In exchange for the protection of the Empire from the Barbarians, everyone must participate in the Empire’s crimes and be complicit. Therefore, everyone protected by the Empire is collectively guilty.
Human Flow. Directed by Ai Weiwei, AC Films, 2017. In this documentary film, artist Ai Weiwei travels across twenty-three countries to capture the mass human migration that is taking place due to war, famine, or climate change. The current mass migration event is bigger than one war or one incident. The film documents individual narratives of suffering as well as the massive scale of population migrating worldwide. It’s a glimpse of the future that is ahead of us, as climate change continues to alter the political and physical landscapes we live in. Ai Weiwei’s film depicts the consequences of the choices we make to address migration and movement.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Stengers describes our political leaders as our guardians who are responsible for keeping us complacent. She states that we must distance ourselves from their perceptions and narratives, and we can’t expect much from them aside from “disappointment and indignation” (Stengers, 35). Can civilians take meaningful action to prevent social injustices without engaging with political leaders?
Stengers personifies climate change by referring to it as the intrusion of Gaia. She describes Gaia as “as the fearsome one, as she who was addressed by peasants, who knew that humans depend on something much greater than them, something that tolerates them, but with a tolerance that is not to be abused (46).” To what extent is climate change a spiritual crisis?
The writers and artist listed above demonstrate that civilians play a key role in upholding structural injustices. Are inaction and indifference passive forms of participation in structural violence? In what ways do we contribute to harmful systemic injustices and how can we prevent them?
